French Canadian vs Alaska Native Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 75,338,305 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Alaska Natives within French Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.415. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.044% in Alaska Natives. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French Canadians corresponds to an increase of 44.3 Alaska Natives.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 14.9%), median male earnings ($54,722 compared to $49,711, a difference of 10.1%), and per capita income ($43,003 compared to $39,558, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,436 compared to $38,202, a difference of 0.61%), householder income under 25 years ($52,672 compared to $54,000, a difference of 2.5%), and median household income ($82,810 compared to $79,509, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 46.0%), receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 36.9%), and family poverty (8.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.15%), single mother poverty (30.8% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 0.35%), and single father poverty (18.6% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 59.7%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 57.3%), and unemployment (4.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 49.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 14.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 17.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 11.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 0.85%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 46.8%), single mother households (6.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 22.4%), and family households with children (26.1% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.7% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 2.2%), divorced or separated (12.8% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 3.3%), and married-couple households (47.5% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 121.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 11.1%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 9.9%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 23.8%), master's degree (14.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 21.4%), and bachelor's degree (35.6% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.010%), 5th grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.020%), and 4th grade (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 56.6%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.7% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 29.1%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (13.4% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 2.0%), male disability (13.3% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 2.8%).