Malaysian vs Alaska Native Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,697,159 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Alaska Natives within Malaysian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.604. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Malaysians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.232% in Alaska Natives. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Malaysians corresponds to an increase of 231.5 Alaska Natives.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($51,615 compared to $54,000, a difference of 4.6%), householder income over 65 years ($58,244 compared to $60,748, a difference of 4.3%), and wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($43,844 compared to $43,750, a difference of 0.22%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,291 compared to $88,018, a difference of 0.31%), and median family income ($95,230 compared to $95,573, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 22.8%), single male poverty (12.6% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 22.2%), and single father poverty (14.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.16%), child poverty among girls under 16 (17.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 0.29%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (17.5% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 64.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 62.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 55.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 20.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 20.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 24.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 0.31%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.7% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.2% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 28.3%), births to unmarried women (33.9% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 13.0%), and average family size (3.31 compared to 3.37, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (29.8% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 0.11%), divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.57%), and currently married (45.9% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 125.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 11.7%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 4.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 7.8%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 87.7%), bachelor's degree (32.9% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 12.2%), and associate's degree (41.6% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 1.1%), nursery school (97.3% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and kindergarten (97.2% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 127.6%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 41.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.10%), female disability (12.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 2.0%).