Immigrants from Uruguay vs Alaska Native Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 44,794,014 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Alaska Natives within Immigrant from Uruguay communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.474. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uruguay within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.021% in Alaska Natives. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uruguay corresponds to an increase of 21.3 Alaska Natives.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,997 compared to $39,558, a difference of 11.2%), householder income over 65 years ($56,975 compared to $60,748, a difference of 6.6%), and median male earnings ($52,860 compared to $49,711, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 0.82%), median female earnings ($38,945 compared to $38,202, a difference of 1.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($96,086 compared to $93,991, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.9% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 30.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 24.9%), and receiving food stamps (12.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (17.2% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 2.0%), child poverty under the age of 16 (16.8% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and poverty (12.8% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 95.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 59.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 57.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 11.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 13.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 20.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.4% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 13.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 44.3%), births to unmarried women (33.9% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 13.0%), and single mother households (6.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (45.0% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 1.2%), divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and family households (63.9% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 45.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 35.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (51.4% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 4.3%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 5.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 22.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 57.8%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 31.8%), and master's degree (15.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.35%), nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 139.2%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 63.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 39.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.090%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 3.4%), and ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 5.4%).