Immigrants from Canada vs Alaska Native Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 74,218,251 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Alaska Natives within Immigrant from Canada communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.254. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Canada within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.415% in Alaska Natives. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Canada corresponds to an increase of 1,415.1 Alaska Natives.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,412 compared to $39,558, a difference of 24.9%), median male earnings ($60,388 compared to $49,711, a difference of 21.5%), and median family income ($112,374 compared to $95,573, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,411 compared to $54,000, a difference of 1.1%), householder income over 65 years ($64,952 compared to $60,748, a difference of 6.9%), and median female earnings ($41,373 compared to $38,202, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 60.7%), married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 39.6%), and family poverty (7.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 32.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.8%), single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 8.7%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 62.4%), male unemployment (5.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 61.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 59.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 12.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 24.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 26.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 4.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 0.37%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 0.92%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 61.8%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 32.4%), and births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.0% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 1.7%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 2.9%), and married-couple households (48.4% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 99.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 12.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 3.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 7.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 56.6%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 54.4%), and master's degree (17.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 48.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (96.0% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.080%), 10th grade (95.1% compared to 94.9%, a difference of 0.19%), and 5th grade (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 103.7%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.1% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 38.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.91%), ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and female disability (12.3% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 4.3%).