New Zealander vs Alaska Native Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 48,464,334 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Alaska Natives within New Zealander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.767. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in New Zealanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 4.612% in Alaska Natives. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 New Zealanders corresponds to an increase of 4,612.0 Alaska Natives.

When considering income, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,575 compared to $39,558, a difference of 27.9%), median male earnings ($61,199 compared to $49,711, a difference of 23.1%), and median family income ($115,230 compared to $95,573, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,294 compared to $54,000, a difference of 1.3%), householder income over 65 years ($67,333 compared to $60,748, a difference of 10.8%), and median female earnings ($42,446 compared to $38,202, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 57.4%), married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 39.5%), and family poverty (8.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.7% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 0.75%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and single mother poverty (29.1% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 80.6%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 69.2%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 61.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 20.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 24.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 25.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.85%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 67.5%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 31.7%), and births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.9% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 3.5%), married-couple households (47.2% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 3.5%), and currently married (47.4% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 70.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 13.2%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 5.8%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 73.9%), professional degree (6.0% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 72.0%), and master's degree (18.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 57.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.9% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.13%), 10th grade (95.0% compared to 94.9%, a difference of 0.13%), and 5th grade (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 145.4%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 41.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 0.59%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 4.6%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 6.4%).