Ecuadorian vs Alaska Native Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,375,060 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Alaska Natives within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.139. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Alaska Natives. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to a decrease of 4.0 Alaska Natives.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $60,748, a difference of 10.5%), wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 6.6%), and per capita income ($41,958 compared to $39,558, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $54,000, a difference of 0.16%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,739 compared to $93,991, a difference of 0.27%), and median family income ($95,114 compared to $95,573, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 37.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 29.3%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.8% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 0.43%), child poverty under the age of 5 (19.2% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 70.6%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 38.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 35.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 2.8%), and female unemployment (6.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 24.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 0.62%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 46.8%), births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 15.1%), and family households with children (27.8% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.18%), average family size (3.32 compared to 3.37, a difference of 1.7%), and single mother households (7.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 64.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 49.3%), and no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 7.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 27.7%), and no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 30.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 100.4%), master's degree (14.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 20.6%), and bachelor's degree (35.4% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 1.3%), college, 1 year or more (54.3% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 169.0%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 78.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 35.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.7%), cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 5.7%).