Swiss vs Alaska Native Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,566,425 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Alaska Natives within Swiss communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.103. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Swiss within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.083% in Alaska Natives. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Swiss corresponds to an increase of 83.5 Alaska Natives.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Swiss and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (30.0% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 22.7%), median male earnings ($55,731 compared to $49,711, a difference of 12.1%), and per capita income ($44,076 compared to $39,558, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($37,904 compared to $38,202, a difference of 0.79%), householder income over 65 years ($61,621 compared to $60,748, a difference of 1.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,493 compared to $54,000, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Swiss and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 61.0%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 44.8%), and family poverty (7.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 34.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 4.1%), single father poverty (17.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 4.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Swiss and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (4.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 71.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 66.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 60.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 14.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 21.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 30.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Swiss and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.3% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 10.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.46%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.7% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Swiss and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 52.6%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 31.4%), and births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.2% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.22%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and average family size (3.15 compared to 3.37, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Swiss and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 121.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.0% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 13.8%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 5.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 9.6%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Swiss and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 37.0%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 29.3%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (97.3% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.030%), 6th grade (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.040%), and 8th grade (97.0% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Swiss and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 80.2%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 33.9%), and hearing disability (3.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.76%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and female disability (12.4% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 3.1%).