Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Alaska Native Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,370,692 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Alaska Natives within Immigrant from Costa Rica communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.453. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Costa Rica within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.065% in Alaska Natives. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Costa Rica corresponds to an increase of 64.8 Alaska Natives.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,464 compared to $39,558, a difference of 9.9%), median male earnings ($53,237 compared to $49,711, a difference of 7.1%), and median household income ($85,054 compared to $79,509, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 1.2%), householder income over 65 years ($59,848 compared to $60,748, a difference of 1.5%), and median female earnings ($39,186 compared to $38,202, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.2% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 28.2%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 24.1%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (16.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.99%), child poverty under the age of 16 (16.6% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 3.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (17.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 72.0%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 52.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 50.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 15.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 18.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 18.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 9.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 46.0%), births to unmarried women (33.4% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 14.8%), and single mother households (6.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.6% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.82%), currently married (46.0% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and married-couple households (46.3% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 69.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 13.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.4% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 3.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 6.6%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 55.7%), professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 26.7%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.26%), nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 122.9%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 55.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.6% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 35.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.72%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 3.5%), and ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 4.1%).