Russian vs Tongan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 101,393,946 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Tongans within Russian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.385. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Russians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.010% in Tongans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Russians corresponds to an increase of 9.5 Tongans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Russian and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($53,154 compared to $41,693, a difference of 27.5%), median male earnings ($63,939 compared to $53,218, a difference of 20.1%), and median earnings ($53,334 compared to $45,665, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($67,626 compared to $68,235, a difference of 0.90%), wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,389 compared to $56,972, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Russian and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (16.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 34.6%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 19.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (10.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.35%), receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 0.48%), and female poverty (11.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Russian and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 31.0%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 20.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 3.8%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Russian and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.7% compared to 41.2%, a difference of 12.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.28%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.31%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Russian and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 25.6%), family households with children (26.5% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 17.8%), and average family size (3.12 compared to 3.49, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.6% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 0.45%), births to unmarried women (28.0% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Russian and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 67.9%), no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 61.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 40.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 92.9%, a difference of 4.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.8% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 15.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 40.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Russian and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.3% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 70.4%), master's degree (19.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 56.5%), and doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 48.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.66%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.66%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Russian and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 12.5%), ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 9.6%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 1.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 3.0%).