Slavic vs Tongan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 77,067,877 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Tongans within Slavic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.038. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Slavs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in Tongans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Slavs corresponds to an increase of 9.1 Tongans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Slavic and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($50,563 compared to $56,972, a difference of 12.7%), householder income over 65 years ($61,709 compared to $68,235, a difference of 10.6%), and per capita income ($45,049 compared to $41,693, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.090%), median family income ($105,144 compared to $105,967, a difference of 0.78%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,377 compared to $99,604, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Slavic and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (17.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 42.1%), single male poverty (13.3% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 27.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (17.0% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 4.8%), female poverty (12.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 5.4%), and family poverty (8.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Slavic and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 30.0%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 18.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.010%), female unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Slavic and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 4.6%), in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 41.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.48%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Slavic and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (26.8% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 16.6%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 12.0%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.49, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.4% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 0.040%), single mother households (5.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.39%), and married-couple households (47.8% compared to 51.6%, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Slavic and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 52.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 30.0%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.2% compared to 92.9%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 9.9%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 24.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Slavic and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 37.9%), master's degree (15.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 24.1%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.69%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.69%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Slavic and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (6.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 18.0%), hearing disability (3.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 17.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (23.0% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 3.6%), disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 4.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 6.0%).