Chickasaw vs Tongan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,585,586 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Tongans within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.905. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.111% in Tongans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 111.4 Tongans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,005 compared to $93,076, a difference of 33.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $108,643, a difference of 32.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $99,604, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 1.1%), median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $53,218, a difference of 11.3%), and median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $38,288, a difference of 11.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.3% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 56.1%), single father poverty (19.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 55.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 54.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 11.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 14.7%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 22.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 41.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 30.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.68%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 8.4%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 41.2%, a difference of 7.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 28.3%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 27.9%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.6% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 3.7%), family households (64.4% compared to 69.6%, a difference of 8.1%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 35.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 19.5%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.9%, a difference of 0.65%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 7.6%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 34.3%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 14.1%), and bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (88.4% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.050%), 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and 12th grade, no diploma (90.3% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 60.0%), hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 54.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 53.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 4.2%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 5.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 26.9%).