German Russian vs Tongan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,960,787 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Tongans within German Russian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.133. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in German Russians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.018% in Tongans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 German Russians corresponds to an increase of 17.5 Tongans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between German Russian and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($45,673 compared to $56,972, a difference of 24.7%), householder income over 65 years ($55,356 compared to $68,235, a difference of 23.3%), and median household income ($75,856 compared to $93,076, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($37,105 compared to $38,288, a difference of 3.2%), per capita income ($40,266 compared to $41,693, a difference of 3.5%), and median earnings ($43,200 compared to $45,665, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between German Russian and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.2% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 46.9%), single father poverty (17.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 44.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (18.8% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 4.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 17.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 17.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between German Russian and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 27.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 23.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between German Russian and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.4% compared to 41.2%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.34%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between German Russian and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (44.0% compared to 51.6%, a difference of 17.2%), births to unmarried women (33.1% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 16.6%), and family households with children (26.8% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 5.7%), currently married (45.5% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 6.2%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between German Russian and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 46.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 43.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 92.9%, a difference of 3.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 14.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 29.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between German Russian and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 24.1%), master's degree (13.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 7.8%), and professional degree (4.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.50%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.50%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between German Russian and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 22.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 18.5%), and ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.3% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 2.2%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.4% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 2.8%).