Creek vs Tongan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Creek
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Tongan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Creek

Tongans

Fair
Good
2,959
SOCIAL INDEX
27.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
237th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,132
SOCIAL INDEX
68.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
130th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Tongan Integration in Creek Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 67,845,922 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Tongans within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.648. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is an increase of 2.128% in Tongans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to an increase of 2,128.2 Tongans.
Creek Integration in Tongan Communities

Creek vs Tongan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $108,643, a difference of 37.6%), median household income ($67,715 compared to $93,076, a difference of 37.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $99,604, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 1.2%), median male earnings ($46,594 compared to $53,218, a difference of 14.2%), and median female earnings ($33,437 compared to $38,288, a difference of 14.5%).
Creek vs Tongan Income
Income MetricCreekTongan
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$35,546
Tragic
$41,693
Median Family Income
Tragic
$82,560
Excellent
$105,967
Median Household Income
Tragic
$67,715
Exceptional
$93,076
Median Earnings
Tragic
$39,648
Fair
$45,665
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$46,594
Fair
$53,218
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,437
Tragic
$38,288
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,371
Exceptional
$56,972
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$74,847
Exceptional
$99,604
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$78,960
Exceptional
$108,643
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$51,949
Exceptional
$68,235
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.1%
Tragic
27.5%

Creek vs Tongan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (24.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 71.0%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 67.1%), and single father poverty (19.8% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 62.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 10.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 17.4%), and married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 30.2%).
Creek vs Tongan Poverty
Poverty MetricCreekTongan
Poverty
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
10.8%
Families
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
7.7%
Males
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
9.7%
Females
Tragic
17.0%
Exceptional
11.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.2%
Exceptional
17.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
19.2%
Exceptional
11.5%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
24.2%
Exceptional
14.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.5%
Exceptional
13.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.5%
Exceptional
13.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.7%
Exceptional
13.6%
Single Males
Tragic
16.8%
Exceptional
10.5%
Single Females
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
18.8%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.8%
Exceptional
12.2%
Single Mothers
Tragic
36.7%
Exceptional
26.5%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
10.9%
Exceptional
9.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
10.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
9.7%

Creek vs Tongan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 40.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 37.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 37.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.17%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 2.2%).
Creek vs Tongan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCreekTongan
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
10.9%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.2%
Exceptional
15.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.6%
Exceptional
5.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Poor
4.6%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Poor
4.9%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
10.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.9%
Exceptional
6.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.4%
Exceptional
6.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.7%

Creek vs Tongan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 10.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.1% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (80.4% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 3.9%), in labor force | age 35-44 (80.0% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 4.5%).
Creek vs Tongan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCreekTongan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.3%
Exceptional
67.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
75.1%
Exceptional
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.1%
Exceptional
41.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Exceptional
77.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
80.7%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
80.4%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.0%
Tragic
83.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
77.7%
Excellent
83.1%

Creek vs Tongan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 32.4%), divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 30.1%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 3.3%), currently married (46.0% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 5.2%), and family households (64.2% compared to 69.6%, a difference of 8.5%).
Creek vs Tongan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCreekTongan
Family Households
Fair
64.2%
Exceptional
69.6%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.4%
Exceptional
31.2%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
45.3%
Exceptional
51.6%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Exceptional
3.49
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.8%
Currently Married
Poor
46.0%
Exceptional
48.3%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
11.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
37.6%
Exceptional
28.4%

Creek vs Tongan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 39.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 21.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.9%, a difference of 0.62%), no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 8.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 9.0%).
Creek vs Tongan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCreekTongan
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
7.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Exceptional
92.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.3%
Exceptional
63.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.9%
Exceptional
26.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.2%
Exceptional
10.0%

Creek vs Tongan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 38.8%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 27.9%), and professional degree (3.1% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (88.3% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.14%), 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.25%), and 12th grade, no diploma (90.3% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 0.48%).
Creek vs Tongan Education Level
Education Level MetricCreekTongan
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.8%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.7%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.7%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.6%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Tragic
96.7%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.9%
Tragic
95.4%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Tragic
95.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.6%
Tragic
94.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.2%
Tragic
93.3%
11th Grade
Average
92.4%
Poor
92.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.3%
Poor
90.7%
High School Diploma
Tragic
88.3%
Tragic
88.4%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.6%
Fair
85.2%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.3%
Fair
64.5%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
52.2%
Poor
57.8%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
37.6%
Tragic
43.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
28.9%
Tragic
34.3%
Master's Degree
Tragic
10.5%
Tragic
12.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.1%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.3%
Poor
1.7%

Creek vs Tongan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 61.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 60.7%), and ambulatory disability (8.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 56.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 2.9%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 6.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 24.0%).
Creek vs Tongan Disability
Disability MetricCreekTongan
Disability
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
10.8%
Males
Tragic
15.5%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females
Tragic
15.7%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.6%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Excellent
6.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.9%
Exceptional
10.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.2%
Fair
23.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
51.5%
Tragic
48.3%
Vision
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
4.4%
Good
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.3%
Tragic
17.8%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.5%
Exceptional
5.4%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.2%