Latvian vs Tongan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 70,576,825 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Tongans within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.083. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.047% in Tongans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to a decrease of 47.5 Tongans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $41,693, a difference of 26.3%), median male earnings ($63,498 compared to $53,218, a difference of 19.3%), and median earnings ($53,001 compared to $45,665, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $68,235, a difference of 1.3%), wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and median household income ($97,311 compared to $93,076, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (16.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 34.7%), married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 21.6%), and single male poverty (12.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (13.4% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 0.080%), child poverty among girls under 16 (13.5% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 0.26%), and single female poverty (19.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 28.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 21.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.79%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 41.2%, a difference of 5.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.31%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.80%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 25.6%), family households with children (26.4% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 18.1%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.49, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.5% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 0.27%), births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 64.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 37.6%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 92.9%, a difference of 2.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 12.9%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 36.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 68.1%), master's degree (19.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 58.7%), and doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 49.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.79%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.79%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 12.1%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 10.2%), and disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.15%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 3.3%).