Ecuadorian vs Tongan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Ecuadorian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Tongan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Ecuadorians

Tongans

Poor
Good
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,132
SOCIAL INDEX
68.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
130th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Tongan Integration in Ecuadorian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 86,914,631 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Tongans within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.153. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Tongans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to an increase of 3.7 Tongans.
Ecuadorian Integration in Tongan Communities

Ecuadorian vs Tongan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $68,235, a difference of 24.2%), wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 19.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,739 compared to $108,643, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($41,958 compared to $41,693, a difference of 0.64%), median earnings ($45,214 compared to $45,665, a difference of 1.0%), and median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $38,288, a difference of 2.2%).
Ecuadorian vs Tongan Income
Income MetricEcuadorianTongan
Per Capita Income
Poor
$41,958
Tragic
$41,693
Median Family Income
Tragic
$95,114
Excellent
$105,967
Median Household Income
Poor
$82,070
Exceptional
$93,076
Median Earnings
Poor
$45,214
Fair
$45,665
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,596
Fair
$53,218
Median Female Earnings
Fair
$39,117
Tragic
$38,288
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,911
Exceptional
$56,972
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Poor
$91,574
Exceptional
$99,604
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$93,739
Exceptional
$108,643
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,958
Exceptional
$68,235
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.9%
Tragic
27.5%

Ecuadorian vs Tongan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 53.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 50.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 50.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 11.6%), single female poverty (21.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 15.2%), and single mother poverty (30.8% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 16.0%).
Ecuadorian vs Tongan Poverty
Poverty MetricEcuadorianTongan
Poverty
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
10.8%
Families
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
7.7%
Males
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
9.7%
Females
Tragic
15.3%
Exceptional
11.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.1%
Exceptional
17.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
11.5%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.2%
Exceptional
14.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
13.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.3%
Exceptional
13.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.8%
Exceptional
13.6%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Exceptional
10.5%
Single Females
Poor
21.6%
Exceptional
18.8%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Exceptional
12.2%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.8%
Exceptional
26.5%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
9.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.7%
Exceptional
10.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.9%
Exceptional
9.7%

Ecuadorian vs Tongan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 49.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 40.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 33.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 14.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 18.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 20.8%).
Ecuadorian vs Tongan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricEcuadorianTongan
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
10.9%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
20.5%
Exceptional
15.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
5.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 75
Good
8.6%
Tragic
10.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Poor
7.9%
Exceptional
6.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Exceptional
6.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
4.7%

Ecuadorian vs Tongan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 41.2%, a difference of 31.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 7.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.34%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.71%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 1.0%).
Ecuadorian vs Tongan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricEcuadorianTongan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.6%
Exceptional
67.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Fair
79.4%
Exceptional
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.4%
Exceptional
41.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.4%
Exceptional
77.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Poor
84.4%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Poor
84.4%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Fair
84.2%
Tragic
83.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.3%
Excellent
83.1%

Ecuadorian vs Tongan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 23.1%), married-couple households (43.5% compared to 51.6%, a difference of 18.6%), and births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.32 compared to 3.49, a difference of 5.3%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 5.6%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 6.0%).
Ecuadorian vs Tongan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricEcuadorianTongan
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Exceptional
69.6%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.8%
Exceptional
31.2%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.5%
Exceptional
51.6%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.32
Exceptional
3.49
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.2%
Exceptional
5.8%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.6%
Exceptional
48.3%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
11.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.3%
Exceptional
28.4%

Ecuadorian vs Tongan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 217.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 124.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 88.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 92.9%, a difference of 19.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 51.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 88.8%).
Ecuadorian vs Tongan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricEcuadorianTongan
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
22.8%
Exceptional
7.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
77.9%
Exceptional
92.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
42.0%
Exceptional
63.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
26.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.5%
Exceptional
10.0%

Ecuadorian vs Tongan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 29.9%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 18.1%), and master's degree (14.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (43.0% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 0.19%), nursery school (97.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.70%), and kindergarten (97.0% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.71%).
Ecuadorian vs Tongan Education Level
Education Level MetricEcuadorianTongan
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.0%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.1%
Tragic
97.8%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.0%
Tragic
97.7%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Tragic
97.7%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Tragic
97.6%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Tragic
97.5%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.0%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.5%
Tragic
96.7%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.0%
Tragic
95.4%
8th Grade
Tragic
93.6%
Tragic
95.1%
9th Grade
Tragic
91.9%
Tragic
94.4%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.6%
Tragic
93.3%
11th Grade
Tragic
89.6%
Poor
92.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.0%
Poor
90.7%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.1%
Tragic
88.4%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.7%
Fair
85.2%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.3%
Fair
64.5%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.3%
Poor
57.8%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.0%
Tragic
43.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.4%
Tragic
34.3%
Master's Degree
Poor
14.0%
Tragic
12.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.9%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Poor
1.7%

Ecuadorian vs Tongan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 21.4%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 15.7%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (23.6% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 0.69%), male disability (10.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.94%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 1.7%).
Ecuadorian vs Tongan Disability
Disability MetricEcuadorianTongan
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
10.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.8%
Excellent
6.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
10.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.6%
Fair
23.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Average
47.4%
Tragic
48.3%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.5%
Good
2.9%
Cognitive
Average
17.2%
Tragic
17.8%
Ambulatory
Good
6.1%
Exceptional
5.4%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.2%