Creek vs Immigrants from Dominican Republic Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,006,199 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Dominican Republic within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.093. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.015% in Immigrants from Dominican Republic. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to an increase of 14.8 Immigrants from Dominican Republic.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Dominican Republic communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 32.0%), householder income over 65 years ($51,949 compared to $45,758, a difference of 13.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $50,204, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($46,594 compared to $46,655, a difference of 0.13%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $78,836, a difference of 0.16%), and median family income ($82,560 compared to $81,233, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Dominican Republic communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 73.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 67.2%), and receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 56.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (24.2% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 0.67%), single mother poverty (36.7% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 6.8%), and single father poverty (19.8% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Dominican Republic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.7% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 40.1%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 39.2%), and unemployment (5.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 37.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 0.55%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 11.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 13.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Dominican Republic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 26.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 71.2%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.1% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Dominican Republic communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 35.3%), married-couple households (45.3% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 21.3%), and currently married (46.0% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.50%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and family households (64.2% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Dominican Republic communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 304.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 120.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 110.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 68.6%, a difference of 34.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 75.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 110.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Dominican Republic communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 107.4%), master's degree (10.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 14.6%), and college, under 1 year (59.3% compared to 54.0%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (37.6% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 0.92%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Dominican Republic communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 78.3%), disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 44.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 40.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 50.3%, a difference of 2.3%), cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 2.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 6.8%).