Creek vs Immigrants from El Salvador Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,527,816 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from El Salvador within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.588. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.070% in Immigrants from El Salvador. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to a decrease of 70.1 Immigrants from El Salvador.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $54,599, a difference of 20.3%), median household income ($67,715 compared to $81,213, a difference of 19.9%), and wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($46,594 compared to $47,973, a difference of 3.0%), median earnings ($39,648 compared to $42,413, a difference of 7.0%), and per capita income ($35,546 compared to $38,394, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 34.1%), single father poverty (19.8% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 32.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.2% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 5.1%), family poverty (11.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 5.5%), and female poverty (17.0% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 22.3%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 22.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 1.6%), male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 14.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 9.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.1% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 23.6%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 13.2%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.49, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.3% compared to 44.3%, a difference of 2.3%), births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 3.1%), and family households (64.2% compared to 67.0%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 34.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 7.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 1.8%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 136.6%), master's degree (10.5% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 14.1%), and professional degree (3.1% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (37.6% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 2.3%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 69.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 58.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 52.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 3.8%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 14.0%).