Creek vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 135,775,530 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Africa within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.289. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.042% in Immigrants from Northern Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to a decrease of 41.9 Immigrants from Northern Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $105,430, a difference of 33.5%), median household income ($67,715 compared to $90,026, a difference of 33.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $99,232, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 7.5%), householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $53,185, a difference of 17.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($51,949 compared to $62,522, a difference of 20.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 52.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (24.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 48.0%), and single male poverty (16.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 41.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.45%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 7.8%), and married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 18.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 27.3%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 21.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.98%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 9.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 8.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (80.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 27.3%), divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 25.4%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.76%), family households (64.2% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and currently married (46.0% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 62.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 27.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 5.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 52.3%, a difference of 11.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 23.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 63.5%), master's degree (10.5% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 62.4%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 57.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.16%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.60%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 64.2%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 59.0%), and hearing disability (4.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 58.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 5.8%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 10.1%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 20.7%).