Creek vs Central American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 139,582,206 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.045. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Central American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to a decrease of 4.0 Central American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 19.7%), median household income ($67,715 compared to $74,847, a difference of 10.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $82,355, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($46,594 compared to $47,433, a difference of 1.8%), householder income over 65 years ($51,949 compared to $53,232, a difference of 2.5%), and median earnings ($39,648 compared to $41,474, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 43.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 38.0%), and married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 34.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (24.2% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 1.2%), single male poverty (16.8% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.5% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 22.4%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 20.4%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 14.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (80.4% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.1% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 13.7%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 7.7%), and currently married (46.0% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.2% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 1.6%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 71.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 15.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 86.7%, a difference of 6.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 52.5%, a difference of 11.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 73.6%), master's degree (10.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 18.3%), and professional degree (3.1% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (59.3% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 0.39%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.4% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 34.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 29.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 0.47%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 50.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 3.4%).