Creek vs French Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,202,092 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of French within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.168. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.024% in French. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to a decrease of 24.0 French.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and French communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $99,824, a difference of 26.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $93,665, a difference of 25.1%), and median family income ($82,560 compared to $102,368, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 5.7%), householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $51,230, a difference of 12.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($51,949 compared to $59,656, a difference of 14.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and French communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 42.2%), family poverty (11.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 41.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 38.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 4.0%), single father poverty (19.8% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 9.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 13.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and French communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 31.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 15.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and French communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 7.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (80.4% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.1% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and French communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 17.0%), divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 12.9%), and births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.2% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 0.17%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.10, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and French communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 4.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 3.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.43%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and French communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 37.2%), master's degree (10.5% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 36.6%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 36.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.18%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.18%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and French communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 36.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 33.2%), and ambulatory disability (8.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 2.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 7.1%), and cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 7.4%).