Creek vs French American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 78,049,414 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of French American Indians within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.381. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.058% in French American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to an increase of 58.5 French American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $85,899, a difference of 14.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $89,811, a difference of 13.7%), and per capita income ($35,546 compared to $40,244, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($51,949 compared to $54,699, a difference of 5.3%), wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 7.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $48,977, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.2% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 20.6%), child poverty under the age of 5 (24.2% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 16.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.5% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 4.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 5.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.2% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 14.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 13.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 0.81%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (80.4% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 4.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 9.0%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 3.1%), and married-couple households (45.3% compared to 44.1%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.11%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and currently married (46.0% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 33.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 8.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 2.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 5.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 28.9%), professional degree (3.1% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 21.4%), and master's degree (10.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.11%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.41%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 29.8%), disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 24.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 2.1%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 4.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 4.6%).