Creek vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,038,138 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.062. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Immigrants from Middle Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to a decrease of 5.4 Immigrants from Middle Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 21.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $91,293, a difference of 15.6%), and median household income ($67,715 compared to $77,559, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($46,594 compared to $49,201, a difference of 5.6%), householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $47,916, a difference of 5.6%), and median earnings ($39,648 compared to $43,416, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 32.7%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.2% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 29.3%), and single father poverty (19.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 4.5%), and receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 9.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 24.1%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 14.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.16%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.38%), and unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 10.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 7.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.1% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 13.8%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 9.9%), and married-couple households (45.3% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.25, a difference of 1.6%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and family households (64.2% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 30.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 24.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 2.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 9.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 20.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 46.7%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 40.5%), and master's degree (10.5% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 38.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.3% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.26%), high school diploma (88.3% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 0.28%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 58.1%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 46.4%), and ambulatory disability (8.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 42.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 1.7%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 9.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 15.7%).