Creek vs Immigrants from Eastern Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,234,619 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Africa within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.567. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.184% in Immigrants from Eastern Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to an increase of 184.0 Immigrants from Eastern Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $98,467, a difference of 24.7%), median household income ($67,715 compared to $84,299, a difference of 24.5%), and median family income ($82,560 compared to $102,451, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $51,158, a difference of 12.8%), median male earnings ($46,594 compared to $53,713, a difference of 15.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($51,949 compared to $61,157, a difference of 17.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.2% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 40.8%), single male poverty (16.8% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 36.9%), and single father poverty (19.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 34.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.55%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 4.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.2% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 13.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 30.3%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 25.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.19%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.87%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 68.5%, a difference of 11.7%), in labor force | age 20-64 (75.1% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 8.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 21.3%), divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 17.8%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.52%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 29.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 25.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 53.7%, a difference of 8.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 21.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 56.7%), master's degree (10.5% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 55.5%), and professional degree (3.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 55.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.19%), 12th grade, no diploma (90.3% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 0.70%), and high school diploma (88.3% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 0.77%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 56.6%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 56.5%), and ambulatory disability (8.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 50.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 0.54%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 9.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 21.2%).