Creek vs Ethiopian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,573,812 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.883. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.354% in Ethiopians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to an increase of 354.1 Ethiopians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($67,715 compared to $89,640, a difference of 32.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $103,736, a difference of 31.4%), and median family income ($82,560 compared to $108,251, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $53,818, a difference of 18.6%), median male earnings ($46,594 compared to $56,243, a difference of 20.7%), and wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 24.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 54.0%), single male poverty (16.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 50.9%), and single father poverty (19.8% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 46.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 2.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.2% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 20.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 34.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 31.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 0.21%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 69.3%, a difference of 13.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (75.1% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 9.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 86.2%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 25.9%), divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 19.9%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.89%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.24, a difference of 1.2%), and currently married (46.0% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 34.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 24.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 9.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 22.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 74.5%), professional degree (3.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 73.0%), and master's degree (10.5% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 70.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.27%), 12th grade, no diploma (90.3% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.79%), and high school diploma (88.3% compared to 89.0%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 63.5%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 62.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 61.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 1.9%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 10.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 28.8%).