Creek vs Immigrants from Ecuador Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 120,564,274 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.394. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.044% in Immigrants from Ecuador. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to an increase of 43.9 Immigrants from Ecuador.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 20.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $89,673, a difference of 19.8%), and median household income ($67,715 compared to $80,341, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($51,949 compared to $54,030, a difference of 4.0%), median male earnings ($46,594 compared to $50,474, a difference of 8.3%), and median earnings ($39,648 compared to $44,462, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 39.5%), single male poverty (16.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 34.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 31.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (11.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 4.8%), receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 6.5%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (21.5% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 25.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 21.6%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 26.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 7.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (80.4% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 21.7%), births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 33.7%, a difference of 11.4%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.2% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.0%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.32, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 206.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 69.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 63.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 21.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 43.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 63.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 88.2%), master's degree (10.5% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 29.2%), and professional degree (3.1% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (59.3% compared to 58.7%, a difference of 0.94%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 76.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 57.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 57.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 6.2%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 8.5%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 10.2%).