Creek vs Hispanic or Latino Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,349,427 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Hispanics or Latinos within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.447. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.201% in Hispanics or Latinos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to a decrease of 200.7 Hispanics or Latinos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $50,279, a difference of 10.8%), wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 9.1%), and median household income ($67,715 compared to $73,823, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($46,594 compared to $46,419, a difference of 0.38%), per capita income ($35,546 compared to $35,688, a difference of 0.40%), and median earnings ($39,648 compared to $40,288, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 36.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 30.8%), and married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (14.1% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 1.8%), poverty (15.6% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and female poverty (17.0% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 21.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 20.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 13.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.1% compared to 77.6%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.4%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (80.4% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 15.6%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 12.6%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.3% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 0.31%), births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 0.54%), and currently married (46.0% compared to 44.1%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 16.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 5.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 0.65%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 85.2%), high school diploma (88.3% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 6.5%), and 10th grade (94.2% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (37.6% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 0.44%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 40.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 37.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 32.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 50.6%, a difference of 1.7%), cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 5.5%).