Creek vs Cheyenne Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,746,664 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Cheyenne within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.463. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.020% in Cheyenne. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to an increase of 19.9 Cheyenne.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 16.3%), median female earnings ($33,437 compared to $35,673, a difference of 6.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $79,152, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $45,275, a difference of 0.21%), per capita income ($35,546 compared to $35,276, a difference of 0.76%), and median household income ($67,715 compared to $66,974, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 52.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 28.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 0.33%), receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and single male poverty (16.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 128.3%), male unemployment (5.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 75.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 74.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 19.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 73.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 77.6%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age 20-64 (75.1% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 0.40%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 15.1%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 12.2%), and births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.11%), family households (64.2% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and married-couple households (45.3% compared to 42.3%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 50.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 15.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 3.6%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 26.1%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 17.8%), and professional degree (3.1% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.020%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.030%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 23.9%), ambulatory disability (8.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 22.9%), and female disability (15.7% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 50.9%, a difference of 1.1%), cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 2.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 2.9%).