Creek vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 137,463,764 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.453. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.017% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to a decrease of 16.9 Immigrants from Oceania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($67,715 compared to $89,100, a difference of 31.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $103,705, a difference of 31.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $97,623, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 5.8%), householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $53,680, a difference of 18.3%), and median male earnings ($46,594 compared to $55,712, a difference of 19.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (24.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 43.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.2% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 41.6%), and single male poverty (16.8% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 35.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.88%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 4.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.2% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 22.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 21.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 19.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.22%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.87%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 6.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.1% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 22.9%), divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 20.8%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.2% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.2%), currently married (46.0% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 25.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 6.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 0.49%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 47.6%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 41.8%), and master's degree (10.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 39.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.21%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.61%), and high school diploma (88.3% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 48.6%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 47.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 41.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 3.9%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 7.2%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 13.7%).