Creek vs Ukrainian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 160,802,273 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Ukrainians within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.371. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.035% in Ukrainians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to an increase of 34.6 Ukrainians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Ukrainian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $108,475, a difference of 37.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $102,451, a difference of 36.9%), and per capita income ($35,546 compared to $48,014, a difference of 35.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 0.69%), householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $53,843, a difference of 18.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($51,949 compared to $63,032, a difference of 21.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Ukrainian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (24.2% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 54.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 52.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.5% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 49.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 8.4%), and single father poverty (19.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 20.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Ukrainian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 21.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 20.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Ukrainian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 7.1%), in labor force | age 20-64 (75.1% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (80.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Ukrainian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 28.5%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 23.3%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.2% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.010%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.14, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Ukrainian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 38.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 14.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 4.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Ukrainian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 63.9%), master's degree (10.5% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 60.4%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 54.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.6% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.030%), 7th grade (96.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.050%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.11%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Ukrainian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 53.7%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 51.6%), and ambulatory disability (8.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 36.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 9.8%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 10.9%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 13.2%).