Creek vs Danish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,315,933 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Danes within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.018. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Danes. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to an increase of 0.7 Danes.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Danish communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $105,619, a difference of 33.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $97,221, a difference of 29.9%), and median household income ($67,715 compared to $87,676, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($33,437 compared to $37,730, a difference of 12.8%), wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 14.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $53,041, a difference of 16.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Danish communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (24.2% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 62.3%), child poverty under the age of 16 (21.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 60.7%), and family poverty (11.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 59.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 13.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.2% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 22.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 24.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Danish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 32.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 30.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 4.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 5.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Danish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 14.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 7.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (80.4% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 4.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Danish communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 30.9%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 27.0%), and divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.17, a difference of 0.78%), family households (64.2% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Danish communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 19.2%), no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 18.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 8.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 12.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Danish communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 41.3%), professional degree (3.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 41.0%), and master's degree (10.5% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 38.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.21%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.21%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Danish communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 54.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 48.2%), and ambulatory disability (8.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 44.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 9.1%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 11.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 11.5%).