Creek vs Immigrants from Uruguay Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 77,256,741 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uruguay within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.009. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Immigrants from Uruguay. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to an increase of 4.1 Immigrants from Uruguay.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($35,546 compared to $43,997, a difference of 23.8%), median household income ($67,715 compared to $82,560, a difference of 21.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $91,171, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($51,949 compared to $56,975, a difference of 9.7%), wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 10.2%), and median male earnings ($46,594 compared to $52,860, a difference of 13.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 42.0%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.2% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 39.6%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (24.2% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 37.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 8.0%), receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 12.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 16.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 22.9%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 17.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.86%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 13.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 7.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (80.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 14.4%), births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 10.8%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.050%), family households (64.2% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 0.43%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.95%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 53.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 33.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 4.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 51.4%, a difference of 13.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 28.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 47.3%), master's degree (10.5% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 42.4%), and no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 41.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.3% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.34%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.73%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.74%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 63.2%), hearing disability (4.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 59.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 45.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 7.7%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 10.8%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 17.4%).