Creek vs Comanche Community Comparison
COMPARE
Creek
Comanche
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Creek
Comanche
2,959
SOCIAL INDEX
27.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
237th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,908
SOCIAL INDEX
16.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
283rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Comanche Integration in Creek Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 77,855,260 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.352. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.011% in Comanche. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to an increase of 10.7 Comanche.
Creek vs Comanche Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $82,152, a difference of 9.8%), median household income ($67,715 compared to $73,747, a difference of 8.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $85,787, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($46,594 compared to $48,202, a difference of 3.5%), median earnings ($39,648 compared to $41,519, a difference of 4.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $47,518, a difference of 4.7%).
Income Metric | Creek | Comanche |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $35,546 | Tragic $38,088 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $82,560 | Tragic $88,556 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $67,715 | Tragic $73,747 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $39,648 | Tragic $41,519 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,594 | Tragic $48,202 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $33,437 | Tragic $35,661 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $45,371 | Tragic $47,518 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $74,847 | Tragic $82,152 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $78,960 | Tragic $85,787 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $51,949 | Tragic $54,922 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.1% | Excellent 25.0% |
Creek vs Comanche Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.2% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 16.3%), child poverty under the age of 5 (24.2% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 15.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.2% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 2.5%), male poverty (14.1% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 2.6%), and married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.2%).
Poverty Metric | Creek | Comanche |
Poverty | Tragic 15.6% | Tragic 15.0% |
Families | Tragic 11.7% | Tragic 11.0% |
Males | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 13.8% |
Females | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 16.2% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.2% | Tragic 23.6% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 19.2% | Tragic 16.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 24.2% | Tragic 21.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 21.5% | Tragic 19.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.5% | Tragic 20.1% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.7% | Tragic 20.2% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.8% | Tragic 16.0% |
Single Females | Tragic 27.4% | Tragic 25.6% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 18.5% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 36.7% | Tragic 33.9% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Average 10.9% | Tragic 12.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 12.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 13.3% |
Creek vs Comanche Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 17.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 16.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.71%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Creek | Comanche |
Unemployment | Poor 5.4% | Tragic 5.5% |
Males | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 5.8% |
Females | Poor 5.4% | Poor 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Poor 11.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Excellent 17.2% | Tragic 20.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.7% | Excellent 10.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.6% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.4% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Poor 4.6% | Tragic 4.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Poor 4.9% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 6.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.9% | Tragic 8.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.4% | Fair 9.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 6.1% |
Creek vs Comanche Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 3.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (80.4% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.0% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 1.8%).
Labor Participation Metric | Creek | Comanche |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 61.3% | Tragic 63.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 75.1% | Tragic 77.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.1% | Exceptional 37.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Good 75.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 80.7% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 80.4% | Tragic 82.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.0% | Tragic 81.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 77.7% | Tragic 79.2% |
Creek vs Comanche Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 6.5%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.7%), and births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 0.080%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.83%), and family households (64.2% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 1.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Creek | Comanche |
Family Households | Fair 64.2% | Tragic 63.5% |
Family Households with Children | Fair 27.4% | Good 27.6% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 45.3% | Tragic 44.5% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Excellent 3.25 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.5% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Poor 46.0% | Tragic 45.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.4% | Tragic 13.5% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 37.6% | Tragic 36.7% |
Creek vs Comanche Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 31.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 5.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 2.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 3.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 4.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Creek | Comanche |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.8% | Good 10.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Good 89.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 58.3% | Excellent 56.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.9% | Exceptional 21.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.2% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Creek vs Comanche Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 25.7%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 16.6%), and master's degree (10.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (83.6% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.030%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.40%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.40%).
Education Level Metric | Creek | Comanche |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Good 2.1% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Good 98.0% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Good 98.0% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Good 98.0% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Good 97.9% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Average 97.8% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Average 97.5% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Average 97.3% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Fair 97.0% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Fair 95.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Poor 95.5% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.6% | Poor 94.6% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.2% | Tragic 93.1% |
11th Grade | Average 92.4% | Tragic 91.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Tragic 89.9% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 88.3% | Tragic 87.9% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.6% | Tragic 83.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 59.3% | Tragic 61.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 52.2% | Tragic 54.4% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 37.6% | Tragic 39.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 28.9% | Tragic 31.9% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 10.5% | Tragic 12.1% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.1% | Tragic 3.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.3% | Tragic 1.6% |
Creek vs Comanche Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 32.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 14.5%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 51.7%, a difference of 0.48%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 1.9%).
Disability Metric | Creek | Comanche |
Disability | Tragic 15.6% | Tragic 14.1% |
Males | Tragic 15.5% | Tragic 14.1% |
Females | Tragic 15.7% | Tragic 14.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.6% | Average 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.9% | Tragic 6.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 8.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.9% | Tragic 14.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 28.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.5% | Tragic 51.7% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 2.8% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.4% | Tragic 4.0% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.3% | Tragic 18.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.5% | Tragic 7.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.9% |