Creek vs Immigrants from Canada Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 165,109,455 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Canada within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.080. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Immigrants from Canada. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to an increase of 5.8 Immigrants from Canada.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($35,546 compared to $49,412, a difference of 39.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $109,402, a difference of 38.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $102,616, a difference of 37.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 4.9%), householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $53,411, a difference of 17.7%), and median female earnings ($33,437 compared to $41,373, a difference of 23.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (24.2% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 53.0%), family poverty (11.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 48.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 48.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 2.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 11.4%), and single father poverty (19.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 20.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 22.3%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 19.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.18%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 6.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (80.4% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.0% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 0.56%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 25.8%), births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 23.4%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.2% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 0.26%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.12, a difference of 2.7%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 12.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 10.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 72.6%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 67.4%), and master's degree (10.5% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 63.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.0%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.0%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 53.5%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 48.0%), and ambulatory disability (8.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 38.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 10.8%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 12.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 14.0%).