Creek vs Carpatho Rusyn Community Comparison

COMPARE

Creek
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Carpatho Rusyn
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Creek

Carpatho Rusyns

Fair
Good
2,959
SOCIAL INDEX
27.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
237th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,651
SOCIAL INDEX
74.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
110th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Carpatho Rusyn Integration in Creek Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 41,391,152 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.158. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.011% in Carpatho Rusyns. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to an increase of 11.4 Carpatho Rusyns.
Creek Integration in Carpatho Rusyn Communities

Creek vs Carpatho Rusyn Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($35,546 compared to $47,248, a difference of 32.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $99,449, a difference of 32.9%), and median family income ($82,560 compared to $107,502, a difference of 30.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 0.51%), householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $49,113, a difference of 8.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($51,949 compared to $61,093, a difference of 17.6%).
Creek vs Carpatho Rusyn Income
Income MetricCreekCarpatho Rusyn
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$35,546
Exceptional
$47,248
Median Family Income
Tragic
$82,560
Exceptional
$107,502
Median Household Income
Tragic
$67,715
Good
$86,635
Median Earnings
Tragic
$39,648
Exceptional
$48,617
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$46,594
Exceptional
$57,572
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,437
Exceptional
$40,825
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,371
Tragic
$49,113
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$74,847
Exceptional
$99,449
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$78,960
Good
$102,777
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$51,949
Average
$61,093
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.1%
Tragic
27.3%

Creek vs Carpatho Rusyn Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 56.7%), family poverty (11.7% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 54.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 49.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 4.6%), single father poverty (19.8% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 10.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 12.2%).
Creek vs Carpatho Rusyn Poverty
Poverty MetricCreekCarpatho Rusyn
Poverty
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
11.3%
Families
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
7.5%
Males
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
10.2%
Females
Tragic
17.0%
Exceptional
12.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.2%
Tragic
21.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
19.2%
Exceptional
12.8%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
24.2%
Fair
17.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.5%
Exceptional
14.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.5%
Exceptional
15.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.7%
Exceptional
15.3%
Single Males
Tragic
16.8%
Tragic
13.4%
Single Females
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
20.0%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.8%
Tragic
18.0%
Single Mothers
Tragic
36.7%
Average
29.1%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
3.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
10.9%
Exceptional
9.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
10.4%

Creek vs Carpatho Rusyn Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 24.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 23.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 0.59%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.76%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.6%).
Creek vs Carpatho Rusyn Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCreekCarpatho Rusyn
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.2%
Poor
17.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.6%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.6%
Good
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Poor
4.6%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Poor
4.9%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
9.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.9%
Tragic
8.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.4%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.8%
Good
5.4%

Creek vs Carpatho Rusyn Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 7.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 7.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (80.4% compared to 86.2%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 6.1%).
Creek vs Carpatho Rusyn Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCreekCarpatho Rusyn
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.3%
Average
65.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
75.1%
Exceptional
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.1%
Exceptional
40.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Exceptional
76.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
80.7%
Exceptional
87.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
80.4%
Exceptional
86.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.0%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
77.7%
Exceptional
83.5%

Creek vs Carpatho Rusyn Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 24.1%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 24.0%), and births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.3% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 0.96%), currently married (46.0% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.06, a difference of 4.5%).
Creek vs Carpatho Rusyn Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCreekCarpatho Rusyn
Family Households
Fair
64.2%
Tragic
61.1%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.4%
Tragic
25.2%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
45.3%
Poor
45.7%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Tragic
3.06
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.7%
Currently Married
Poor
46.0%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.4%
Excellent
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
37.6%
Good
30.9%

Creek vs Carpatho Rusyn Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 37.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 30.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 7.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 21.4%).
Creek vs Carpatho Rusyn Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCreekCarpatho Rusyn
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Fair
10.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Fair
89.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.3%
Poor
54.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.9%
Tragic
18.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.2%
Tragic
5.5%

Creek vs Carpatho Rusyn Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 70.3%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 67.9%), and master's degree (10.5% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 66.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.28%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.28%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.28%).
Creek vs Carpatho Rusyn Education Level
Education Level MetricCreekCarpatho Rusyn
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Exceptional
1.4%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.7%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.7%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.6%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.6%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.4%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
98.1%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Exceptional
98.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.6%
Exceptional
96.7%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.2%
Exceptional
95.9%
11th Grade
Average
92.4%
Exceptional
94.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.3%
Exceptional
93.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
88.3%
Exceptional
92.1%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.6%
Exceptional
89.1%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.3%
Exceptional
67.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
52.2%
Exceptional
62.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
37.6%
Exceptional
50.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
28.9%
Exceptional
42.1%
Master's Degree
Tragic
10.5%
Exceptional
17.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
2.3%

Creek vs Carpatho Rusyn Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 54.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 46.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 40.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 7.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 9.7%), and disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 44.8%, a difference of 14.8%).
Creek vs Carpatho Rusyn Disability
Disability MetricCreekCarpatho Rusyn
Disability
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
12.3%
Males
Tragic
15.5%
Tragic
11.9%
Females
Tragic
15.7%
Tragic
12.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.6%
Tragic
1.4%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.9%
Fair
11.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
21.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
51.5%
Exceptional
44.8%
Vision
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
4.4%
Tragic
3.4%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.3%
Excellent
17.0%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.5%
Fair
6.2%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.4%