Creek vs Portuguese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 163,681,597 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Portuguese within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.189. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Portuguese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to a decrease of 5.2 Portuguese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $105,309, a difference of 33.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $99,429, a difference of 32.8%), and median household income ($67,715 compared to $88,976, a difference of 31.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.86%), householder income over 65 years ($51,949 compared to $61,440, a difference of 18.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $54,436, a difference of 20.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (24.2% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 46.6%), child poverty under the age of 16 (21.5% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 42.6%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (21.7% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 41.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 3.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 4.5%), and receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 16.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 33.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 20.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.030%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 0.090%), and male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 5.8%), in labor force | age 35-44 (80.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.1% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 40.0%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 76.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (80.4% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 18.3%), births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 11.1%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.35%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.92%), and family households (64.2% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 10.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 3.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 0.81%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 0.38%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 0.61%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (10.5% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 32.5%), professional degree (3.1% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 31.2%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (88.3% compared to 88.5%, a difference of 0.31%), 12th grade, no diploma (90.3% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 0.33%), and 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.0%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 41.4%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 41.4%), and ambulatory disability (8.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 32.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 1.9%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 8.0%), and cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 8.0%).