Creek vs French Canadian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 171,274,385 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of French Canadians within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.313. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.011% in French Canadians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to a decrease of 11.5 French Canadians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $99,093, a difference of 25.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $93,694, a difference of 25.2%), and median family income ($82,560 compared to $101,634, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 3.5%), householder income over 65 years ($51,949 compared to $57,975, a difference of 11.6%), and median female earnings ($33,437 compared to $38,436, a difference of 14.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 45.2%), family poverty (11.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 43.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 38.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.2%), single father poverty (19.8% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 6.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 43.3%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 17.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.42%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 11.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.1% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 16.3%), divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 12.2%), and births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.2% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 0.75%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.07, a difference of 4.1%), and currently married (46.0% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 8.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 6.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.010%), no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.82%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (10.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 34.0%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 32.4%), and professional degree (3.1% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.17%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.17%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 40.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 30.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 2.3%), cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 7.1%), and disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 9.5%).