Creek vs Barbadian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 81,119,058 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Barbadians within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.007. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Barbadians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to an increase of 0.5 Barbadians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 43.1%), median female earnings ($33,437 compared to $41,261, a difference of 23.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $89,565, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($51,949 compared to $54,163, a difference of 4.3%), median male earnings ($46,594 compared to $51,236, a difference of 10.0%), and median family income ($82,560 compared to $93,919, a difference of 13.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 38.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 31.3%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.2% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.8%), family poverty (11.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and male poverty (14.1% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 32.2%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 30.5%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 30.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.39%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 26.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 4.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.1% compared to 78.8%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 20.5%), divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 19.3%), and married-couple households (45.3% compared to 39.4%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 1.6%), family households (64.2% compared to 62.5%, a difference of 2.7%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.29, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 235.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 84.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 74.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 24.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 52.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 74.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 58.5%), master's degree (10.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 39.8%), and professional degree (3.1% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 33.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (83.6% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.84%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 73.6%), disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 58.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 46.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 0.23%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 3.3%), and disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 7.1%).