Creek vs Lebanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 154,736,804 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Lebanese within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.022. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Lebanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to an increase of 0.7 Lebanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $104,734, a difference of 32.6%), median household income ($67,715 compared to $88,091, a difference of 30.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $97,339, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 2.7%), householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $50,355, a difference of 11.0%), and median female earnings ($33,437 compared to $40,006, a difference of 19.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 45.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (24.2% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 39.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.5% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 32.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 5.8%), and single father poverty (19.8% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 12.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 21.5%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 18.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.53%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.88%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 6.1%), in labor force | age 20-64 (75.1% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 27.1%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 21.3%), and divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.15%), family households (64.2% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.45%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 13.0%), no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 11.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.94%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 62.4%), master's degree (10.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 56.9%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 52.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.6% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.080%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.24%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 50.0%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 48.4%), and ambulatory disability (8.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 39.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 7.5%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 9.9%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 15.9%).