Creek vs Ghanaian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 101,159,251 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.105. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.010% in Ghanaians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to a decrease of 9.7 Ghanaians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($67,715 compared to $83,582, a difference of 23.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $97,277, a difference of 23.2%), and wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($46,594 compared to $52,810, a difference of 13.3%), householder income over 65 years ($51,949 compared to $60,043, a difference of 15.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $52,594, a difference of 15.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.2% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 33.3%), single female poverty (27.4% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 27.3%), and single male poverty (16.8% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 1.3%), married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 7.6%), and male poverty (14.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 20.6%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 18.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.97%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 10.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 9.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 0.31%), in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 19.3%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 11.7%), and births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.2% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.29, a difference of 2.7%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 111.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 37.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 10.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 21.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 33.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 56.1%), master's degree (10.5% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 47.7%), and professional degree (3.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 37.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.3% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.35%), high school diploma (88.3% compared to 87.7%, a difference of 0.64%), and ged/equivalency (83.6% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.88%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 71.3%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 45.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 44.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 0.020%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 8.3%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 14.4%).