Creek vs Immigrants from Western Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 153,618,786 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Western Asia within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.090. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.014% in Immigrants from Western Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to a decrease of 13.7 Immigrants from Western Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $106,217, a difference of 34.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $99,516, a difference of 33.0%), and median household income ($67,715 compared to $90,005, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 3.1%), householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $52,190, a difference of 15.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($51,949 compared to $62,645, a difference of 20.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 49.5%), child poverty under the age of 5 (24.2% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 41.9%), and single female poverty (27.4% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 37.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 11.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 19.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 18.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.42%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 12.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 73.5%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 38.0%), divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 28.8%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.2% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.14%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.26, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 42.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 21.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.0%, a difference of 3.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 7.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 19.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 74.7%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 66.9%), and master's degree (10.5% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 66.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.060%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.75%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 62.5%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 57.0%), and hearing disability (4.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 52.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 5.1%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 7.2%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 8.5%).