Creek vs Icelander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,516,698 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Icelanders within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.372. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in Icelanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to an increase of 9.4 Icelanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $102,261, a difference of 29.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $95,560, a difference of 27.7%), and median household income ($67,715 compared to $85,797, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 1.2%), householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $51,247, a difference of 13.0%), and median female earnings ($33,437 compared to $39,109, a difference of 17.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (24.2% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 48.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 43.5%), and family poverty (11.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 39.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 6.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.2% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 30.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 24.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.31%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.63%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 7.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.1% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.0% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 23.9%), divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 20.2%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.43%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.84%), and family households (64.2% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 23.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 0.42%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 54.6%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 52.4%), and master's degree (10.5% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 47.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.6% compared to 95.7%, a difference of 0.060%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.080%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 49.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 48.6%), and ambulatory disability (8.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 42.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 3.8%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 10.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 20.1%).