Creek vs Sudanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,387,271 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.614. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.038% in Sudanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to an increase of 38.3 Sudanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $93,718, a difference of 18.7%), per capita income ($35,546 compared to $41,695, a difference of 17.3%), and median family income ($82,560 compared to $96,783, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $46,982, a difference of 3.5%), median male earnings ($46,594 compared to $51,216, a difference of 9.9%), and median earnings ($39,648 compared to $44,419, a difference of 12.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.2% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 33.1%), single male poverty (16.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 29.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (24.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.2% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 43.5%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 40.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 4.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 5.3%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 68.0%, a difference of 11.0%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 9.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.1% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 5.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (80.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 16.3%), births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 15.9%), and married-couple households (45.3% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.050%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.050%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 27.9%), no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 26.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 8.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 22.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 55.4%), professional degree (3.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 49.9%), and master's degree (10.5% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 45.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 0.020%), 10th grade (94.2% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.67%), and 2nd grade (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 53.0%), hearing disability (4.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 49.2%), and ambulatory disability (8.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 48.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 3.3%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 8.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 17.5%).