Creek vs Guatemalan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 156,250,184 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.362. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.047% in Guatemalans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to a decrease of 47.0 Guatemalans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 19.9%), householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $51,525, a difference of 13.6%), and median household income ($67,715 compared to $75,961, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($46,594 compared to $46,736, a difference of 0.30%), median earnings ($39,648 compared to $41,205, a difference of 3.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($51,949 compared to $54,526, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 28.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 23.7%), and single male poverty (16.8% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.55%), child poverty among girls under 16 (21.7% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.5% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 21.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 20.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 0.71%), male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 10.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.1% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (80.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 18.5%), single father households (2.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 13.9%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 1.2%), family households (64.2% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and married-couple households (45.3% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 41.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 9.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 3.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 3.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 111.1%), professional degree (3.1% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 12.0%), and master's degree (10.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.9%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 55.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 44.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 41.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 2.9%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 10.2%).