Creek vs Immigrants from Moldova Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 72,989,636 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Moldova within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.158. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.008% in Immigrants from Moldova. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to an increase of 8.4 Immigrants from Moldova.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $107,357, a difference of 36.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $101,091, a difference of 35.1%), and median household income ($67,715 compared to $91,446, a difference of 35.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 3.6%), householder income over 65 years ($51,949 compared to $62,939, a difference of 21.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $56,168, a difference of 23.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (24.2% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 67.0%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 57.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.5% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 56.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 3.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 5.4%), and receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 29.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 35.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 27.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 0.62%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 7.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 7.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.1% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 37.7%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 24.4%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.2% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.43%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.70%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.96%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 26.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 20.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 14.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (10.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 58.1%), professional degree (3.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 57.4%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 45.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.6% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.10%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.38%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 59.7%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 56.7%), and hearing disability (4.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 44.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 8.4%), cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 9.4%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 10.8%).