Creek vs Indian (Asian) Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 170,535,335 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.184. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.020% in Indians (Asian). To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to a decrease of 20.0 Indians (Asian).

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $119,496, a difference of 59.7%), median household income ($67,715 compared to $105,262, a difference of 55.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $122,343, a difference of 54.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 2.6%), householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $58,239, a difference of 28.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($51,949 compared to $70,238, a difference of 35.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (24.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 80.0%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 71.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 63.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 10.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.2% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 23.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 41.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 27.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.59%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 0.64%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 22.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 7.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 71.9%, a difference of 3.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 48.7%), divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 41.3%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 37.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.74%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.24, a difference of 1.4%), and family households (64.2% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 80.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 14.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 7.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 9.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 11.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 116.1%), professional degree (3.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 110.7%), and master's degree (10.5% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 94.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 0.11%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.80%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 90.8%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 73.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 64.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 8.5%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 10.6%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 21.2%).