Creek vs Belgian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 142,614,134 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Belgians within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.094. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Belgians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to an increase of 2.4 Belgians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Belgian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $100,060, a difference of 26.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $94,262, a difference of 25.9%), and median family income ($82,560 compared to $102,788, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 6.1%), householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $50,113, a difference of 10.4%), and median female earnings ($33,437 compared to $38,382, a difference of 14.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Belgian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (11.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 46.5%), married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 45.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (24.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 45.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 4.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 15.0%), and single father poverty (19.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 18.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Belgian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 27.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 27.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Belgian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 43.4%, a difference of 10.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 7.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.1% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 77.8%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Belgian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 20.1%), births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 18.9%), and divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.2% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 0.62%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.11, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Belgian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 6.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 3.5%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 0.19%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Belgian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 39.4%), master's degree (10.5% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 37.6%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 36.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.070%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.080%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Belgian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 50.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 44.3%), and ambulatory disability (8.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 9.4%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 12.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 14.4%).