Creek vs Ute Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 42,454,290 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Ute within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.456. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.025% in Ute. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to a decrease of 24.8 Ute.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Ute communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $49,997, a difference of 10.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $82,166, a difference of 9.8%), and median household income ($67,715 compared to $72,402, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($51,949 compared to $52,949, a difference of 1.9%), wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and per capita income ($35,546 compared to $36,651, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Ute communities in the United States are seen in male poverty (14.1% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 15.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 11.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (21.5% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 0.030%), child poverty among boys under 16 (21.5% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 0.21%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (21.7% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Ute communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 37.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 36.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 35.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.24%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Ute communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 5.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (75.1% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (80.4% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 60.9%, a difference of 0.71%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.0% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Ute communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 14.0%), single father households (2.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 13.8%), and births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.2% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 0.28%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and married-couple households (45.3% compared to 44.4%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Ute communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 49.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 21.7%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 3.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Ute communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 49.6%), no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 37.9%), and professional degree (3.1% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.20%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.20%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Ute communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 0.86%, a difference of 91.2%), ambulatory disability (8.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 41.6%), and male disability (15.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 2.2%), cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 5.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 10.6%).