Creek vs Central American Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 172,369,250 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Central Americans within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.260. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.037% in Central Americans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to a decrease of 37.1 Central Americans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Central American communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 17.4%), median household income ($67,715 compared to $78,803, a difference of 16.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $52,626, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($46,594 compared to $48,093, a difference of 3.2%), median earnings ($39,648 compared to $42,280, a difference of 6.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($51,949 compared to $56,321, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Central American communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.8% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 28.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 27.5%), and single father poverty (19.8% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 0.090%), family poverty (11.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 3.8%), and female poverty (17.0% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Central American communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 18.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 18.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 0.090%), male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.56%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Central American communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 12.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.1% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 0.67%), in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Central American communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 18.6%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 9.7%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 2.3%), family households (64.2% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and married-couple households (45.3% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Central American communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 38.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 7.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 1.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 3.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Central American communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 107.3%), master's degree (10.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 16.0%), and professional degree (3.1% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (52.2% compared to 52.1%, a difference of 0.14%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Central American communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 59.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 50.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 45.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 3.5%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 5.4%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 11.8%).