Creek vs Native/Alaskan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 175,760,151 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.791. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.811% in Natives/Alaskans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to an increase of 810.7 Natives/Alaskans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 10.4%), per capita income ($35,546 compared to $33,279, a difference of 6.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $47,704, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($67,715 compared to $67,879, a difference of 0.24%), householder income over 65 years ($51,949 compared to $52,081, a difference of 0.25%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $75,647, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 34.1%), married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 32.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (36.7% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 0.16%), single female poverty (27.4% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.2% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 38.5%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 35.4%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.7% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 33.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 21.9%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 22.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 22.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 7.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 0.77%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 60.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.0% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 23.2%), births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 14.4%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.2% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 3.4%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and married-couple households (45.3% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 34.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 13.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 2.3%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 2.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 37.0%), bachelor's degree (28.9% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 9.6%), and associate's degree (37.6% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.45%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.45%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 18.0%), ambulatory disability (8.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 12.3%), and female disability (15.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 0.63%), cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.71%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 1.1%).