Creek vs Immigrants from Chile Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 108,541,166 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.447. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.033% in Immigrants from Chile. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to a decrease of 33.3 Immigrants from Chile.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $103,412, a difference of 31.0%), median household income ($67,715 compared to $88,388, a difference of 30.5%), and per capita income ($35,546 compared to $46,213, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 5.5%), householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $52,440, a difference of 15.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($51,949 compared to $62,354, a difference of 20.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (24.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 47.2%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 46.8%), and single male poverty (16.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 39.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 7.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 14.6%), and married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 16.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 24.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 22.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.22%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 12.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 7.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 0.52%), in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.0% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 20.5%), divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 19.0%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.2% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.62%), currently married (46.0% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 0.95%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.97%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 41.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 18.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 3.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 7.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 16.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 70.1%), master's degree (10.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 59.5%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 56.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.080%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.57%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 66.8%), hearing disability (4.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 55.5%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 53.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 7.6%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 10.7%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 19.8%).